Abstract
The Argument from Spiritual Non-Convergence presents an epistemic challenge to classical theism based on the persistent, irreconcilable divergence of experiential, doctrinal, and moral revelations reported across geographically and culturally isolated civilizations.
I. The Convergence Hypothesis
In standard scientific and perceptual epistemology, when multiple observers interact with an objective, universally active reality (e.g., gravity, optics, chemistry), their empirical models gradually converge over time toward common invariants, regardless of cultural origin.
II. The Problem of Irreconcilable Divergence
- If a single, omnipotent, omniscient, and universally benevolent Deity actively communicated with human consciousness, earnest seekers globally would converge upon fundamental theological truths.
- Historically and empirically, independent spiritual seekers arrive at mutually exclusive claims (e.g., monotheism vs. polytheism vs. pantheism vs. anatta/non-self).
- Therefore, subjective spiritual experiences reflect socio-cultural conditioning and neural neurochemistry rather than veridical communion with a singular divine intelligence.
III. Epistemic Conclusion
Spiritual non-convergence constitutes robust Bayesian evidence against the hypothesis of an active, communicative personal creator seeking universal fellowship with humanity.